An Effective Program to Reduce Malpractice Claims and Payments in a Large Orthopaedic Practice.

BACKGROUND: High reliability in health care requires a balance between intentionally designed systems and individual professional accountability. One element of accountability includes a process for addressing clinicians whose practices are associated with a disproportionate share of patient complaints. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of the Patient Advocacy Reporting System (PARS), a tiered intervention model to reduce patient complaints about clinicians. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted involving a southeastern U.S. orthopaedic group practice. The study assessed the implementation of the PARS program and subsequent malpractice claims from 2004 to 2020. RESULTS: The implementation of PARS was associated with an 83% reduction in malpractice claims cost per high-risk clinician after intervention (p = 0.05; Wilcoxon rank sum test). The overall practice group experienced an 87% reduction in mean annual claims cost per clinician (p = 0.007; segmented regression). The successful adoption required essential elements such as PARS champions, peer messengers, an Office of Patient Affairs, and a clear statement of practice values and professionalism expectations at the time of onboarding. CONCLUSIONS: The PARS program was successfully adopted within a surgical specialty group as a part of ongoing risk prevention and management efforts. The period following PARS was associated with a retrospectively measured reduction in malpractice claim costs. The PARS program can be effectively implemented in a large, single-specialty orthopaedic practice setting and, although not necessarily causal, was, in our case, associated with a period of reduced malpractice claim costs. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: We have learned in previous research that there are clear links between professionalism and patient outcomes (e.g., surgical complications), but agree that the focus here on medical malpractice is not directly clinical.

Building a Culture of Wellness in an Orthopaedic Group: Experiences at OrthoCarolina.

INTRODUCTION: Physician wellness is a much broader concept than physician satisfaction, although physician satisfaction tends to be the predominant form of measurement. The purpose of this paper is to offer some key strategies for building a culture of physician wellness in the unique setting of a large, private group of orthopaedic surgeons. METHODS: Organizational culture was assessed formally through validated physician satisfaction surveys and data gathered through the Patient Advocacy Reporting System (PARS program, and informally through organic, organizational initiatives, and responses. In addition, the authors continuously reviewed literature related to physician engagement, satisfaction and wellness, and organizational interventions designed to promote the same. RESULTS: From 2014 to 2018, overall physician engagement improved and remained above the 90th percentile as compared with the vendor's database of over 95,000 physicians surveyed nationally. Physician resilience, a measure of the predictors of physician burnout, also improved from 2014 to 2018 and is now above the national physician average. During the same time period, significant improvement was noted as it relates to a physician's ability to disconnect and "recharge" outside of work (an important element of overall wellness). From 2016 to 2018, PARS interventions aimed at increasing professionalism and identifying at-risk physicians decreased by 23%. DISCUSSION: At OrthoCarolina, we believe that developing a nurturing environment with good interpersonal connections is foundational to our success. Physicians within the group also report that supportive avenues such as mentor programs and organized activities outside of the workplace amplified the sense of connection and community within the physician group. CONCLUSIONS: Organizational culture of a physician group is a key determinant of physician wellness. It is imperative to have the full support of the physicians within the organization and its leaders to promote and support a culture of wellness. Data-driven programs create awareness and foster curiosity, which in turn allows for the development of specific initiatives including informal, organic initiatives that build connection and community.

Appropriate Use Criteria for Treatment of Pediatric Supracondylar Humerus Fractures With Vascular Injury: Do Our Hospital Practice Patterns Agree With Current Recommendations?

BACKGROUND: Managing the pulseless pediatric supracondylar humerus fracture (PSHF) remains a significant clinical decision-making challenge for the treating surgeon. The purpose of the study is to determine frequency of the treatments according to the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) Appropriate Use Criteria (AUC) for the PSHF with vascular injury and evaluate the appropriateness of these interventions. METHODS: We identified all PSHF with concern for vascular injury at one high volume, level 1 trauma center managed by 6 fellowship-trained pediatric orthopaedic surgeons over 4.5 years. Demographic information and other injury and treatment variables were obtained. Each patient was classified as 1 of the 6 patient scenarios specified by the AAOS AUC. Each of the 18 interventions identified in the AUC were documented, including the level of "appropriateness" as specified by AAOS AUC. RESULTS: A total of 638 PSHF were managed identified; of these, 52 were pink, pulseless, or dysvascular (8.2%). Only 7 of the 18 treatment options suggested by the AUC were used in this cohort. Across all 7 interventions used in this cohort, 20.2% (17/84) of interventions were "appropriate," 52.4% (44/84) were "maybe appropriate," 22.6% (19/84) were "rarely appropriate," and 4.8% (4/84) were not listed in treatment options. CONCLUSIONS: Supracondylar fractures are the most common injury to the elbow seen in children and are variable in presentation and management. The pink, pulseless fracture continues to be a major topic for research and discussion due to the morbidity if not treated "appropriately." The AUC were created to help guide practitioners when strong evidence is lacking. In this study at a single, pediatric hospital, there was variation and disagreement with "appropriateness" of treatments that were performed but this discrepancy did not result in any poor outcomes. Although the AUC do offer valuable guidance, our findings highlight a need for continued research in this area to help validate the AUC and help strengthen the recommendations moving forward. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III-retrospective.

Perioperative Complication Rates in Pediatric Total Joint Arthroplasty Patients Compared With Adults: Results of a Matched Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: One of the least studied areas in orthopaedics is total joint arthroplasty (TJA) in pediatric patients. Recent studies have confirmed that these procedures are being performed on pediatric patients, making it critical to understand the rates of surgical complications in this patient population. We sought to examine the frequency in which surgical complications occur in pediatric patients, aged 20 and younger, undergoing TJA compared with adults. METHODS: Data from the 2003 to 2012 Kids' Inpatient Database (ages 20 and younger) and 2002 to 2013 National Inpatient Sample (ages 21 and over) were analyzed. Pediatric patients were matched to 3 adult controls (1 per age group: 21 to 50, 51 to 65, and over 65 y) using patient characteristics including sex, race, orthopaedic diagnosis, and preoperative loss of function. Comparisons were then made between the rates and relative risks (RRs) of surgical complications between pediatric and adult patients. Finally, we examined patient factors associated with surgical complications, utilizing modified Poisson regression models with robust SEs. RESULTS: Three adult controls (ie, 1 control from each age group) were identified for 1385 pediatric patients, for a total sample of 5540 TJA patients. Approximately 10% of pediatric patients experienced either major or minor surgical complications. The overall rate of major complications in pediatric patients was 5.05%, compared with 4.79% in adult controls [RR: 1.06 (0.81 to 1.38), P=0.69]. The overall rate of minor complications in pediatric patients was 5.78%, compared with 5.68% in adult controls [RR: 1.02 (0.80 to 1.30), P=0.78]. When adjusted for patient demographics, the RR of major complications was 49% higher in pediatric patients compared with ages 21 to 50 [RR: 1.49 (1.03 to 2.16), P=0.03] with no statistically significant differences noted for other age groups. For minor complications, the adjusted RR in pediatric patients, compared with any other age group, did not approach statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS: Pediatric patients undergoing TJA experience major and minor surgical complications at rates comparable with their adult counterparts. Our findings offer important insight on the rates of surgical complications in pediatric TJA patients, which is valuable for preoperative education and consultation with patients and families. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III-therapeutic.

Restoration of Blood Flow to the Proximal Femoral Epiphysis in Unstable Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis by Modified Dunn Procedure: A Preliminary Angiographic and Intracranial Pressure Monitoring Study.

BACKGROUND: The major complication of unstable slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) is avascular necrosis (AVN) of the femoral head. The purpose of this study was to document by angiography the preoperative and postoperative perfusion to the proximal femoral epiphysis following an unstable SCFE. A specific aim was to determine whether blood flow could be restored. A secondary aim was to determine the efficacy of an intracranial pressure (ICP) monitor to assess blood flow within the femoral head intraoperatively. METHODS: Nine patients with an unstable SCFE underwent superselective angiogram of the medial circumflex femoral artery preoperatively, followed by operative fixation with an open reduction using a modified Dunn approach. Femoral head blood flow was evaluated with an ICP monitor. Angiography was repeated postoperatively. Patients were followed radiographically to assess for AVN. RESULTS: Follow-up averaged 22 months. Six patients did not have arterial flow to the femoral head on the preoperative angiogram. Flow was restored postoperatively on angiogram in 4 of the 6 patients. Two patients developed AVN. One had no flow to the femoral head preoperatively or postoperatively on angiogram and complete tearing of the periosteum was noted. In 1 patient, there was no ICP waveform after the initial reduction. After removing more callous and repeating reduction, the waveform returned. Of the 2 patients with AVN, 1 had an ICP waveform after reduction. CONCLUSIONS: This study documents that some patients with unstable SCFE present with reduced femoral head blood supply due to SCFE. It also demonstrates blood flow restoration in 4 patients by angiogram and 5 by ICP monitor after surgical treatment. No patient immediately lost blood flow due to surgery. ICP monitor is a safe intraoperative tool for real-time assessment of femoral head blood flow during open reduction of unstable SCFE. Presence of flow by ICP is not a guarantee that AVN will not develop, but absence of flow was predictive of AVN. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic level I-prognostic. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Repeat surgical interventions following "definitive" instrumentation and fusion for idiopathic scoliosis.

STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective chart review was performed on all idiopathic scoliosis patients treated with instrumented spinal fusion over a 15-year period. OBJECTIVES: To provide an experience from a single institution over a prolonged time period. The goal was to determine the frequency of repeat surgical interventions following the "definitive" spinal fusion surgery and identify the factors responsible for these reoperations. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Instrumented spinal fusion remains the standard of care in the surgical management of idiopathic scoliosis. This surgery is considered a "definitive" procedure where, barring a complication, no additional surgical procedures are planned. Although many studies have reported the frequency of specific complications following spinal fusion, little information currently exists regarding the cumulative average of these repeat surgical interventions that occur following these "definitive" procedures. METHODS: Surgical logs were reviewed on all patients who had an instrumented spinal fusion for idiopathic scoliosis from January 1988 through December 2002. All subsequent surgical interventions on these patients were then identified from the logs through December 2004. Pertinent information was gleaned from surgical logs and patient charts to provide details for these reoperations. RESULTS: A total of 1,046 patients underwent an instrumented spinal fusion for idiopathic scoliosis: 809 had a posterior-only fusion, 228 had an anterior-only fusion, and 9 had a combined anterior/posterior spinal fusion. A total of 172 repeat surgical interventions were performed in 135 patients (12.9%). Of these 135 patients, 29 patients (21.5%) had two or more separate procedures performed. The most common reasons for reoperation were infection, symptomatic implant, and pseudarthrosis. Patients who had posterior fusions had a significantly higher rate of reoperation than patients who had anterior fusions (14.0% vs. 9.3%). Reoperations due to infections and symptomatic implants occurred with significantly higher frequency in the posterior spine fusion group compared with those with anterior spinal fusion. No differences in rates of reoperation for pseudarthrosis were noted between posterior and anterior fusion groups. CONCLUSIONS: Repeat surgical interventions are relatively common following these supposedly definitive surgical procedures. The most common reasons for return to surgery are infection, symptomatic implant, and pseudarthrosis.